The photos and videos shown here may be of a different model, model year or body type from the one selected. The ratings of one vehicle often apply to other models if they are built on the same platform. In addition, a test of a vehicle from one model year may apply to earlier or later model years if the vehicle hasn’t been significantly redesigned.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Restraints and dummy kinematics |
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Leg/foot, left | |
Leg/foot, right | |
Restraints and dummy kinematics |
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Head protection | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Head protection |
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Curb weight | 3,058 lbs |
Peak force | 15,167 lbs |
Strength-to-weight ratio | 4.96 |
Tested vehicle Rating applies to both the Impreza 4-door sedan (tested) and wagon versions and to the structurally identical 2018 and later Crosstrek wagon. |
2017 Subaru Impreza 2.0i Premium 4-door 4wd |
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Dynamic rating | |
Seat/head restraint geometry |
|
|
---|---|
|
|
Overall Evaluation | |
This system meets the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's criteria for forward collision warning.
|
1 point |
In the 12 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
|
2 points |
In the 25 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
|
3 points |
|
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
Yes
|
|
Overall rating | |
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve. The low beams created some glare. |
|
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests. High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on the gradual left curve. |
|
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
No
|
|
Overall rating | |
|
|
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve. The low beams created some glare. |
|
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests. |
|
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
No
|
|
Overall rating | |
|
|
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was fair on both right curves and inadequate on both left curves. The low beams never exceeded glare limits. |
|
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual right curve and inadequate on the sharp right and both left curves. |
|
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
No
|
|
Overall rating | |
|
|
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests. The low beams never exceeded glare limits. |
|
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual right curve and inadequate on the sharp right and both left curves. |
Good | No hardware available | ||
Acceptable | Tether anchor | ||
Marginal | Lower anchors | ||
Poor | |||
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |||
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. |
Overall evaluation | + |
---|
1 | |
---|---|
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
|
|
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
|
|
2 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
|
|
Lower anchors | |
Can be borrowed from 1 and 3 | |
3 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
|
|
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
|